The Castro Trump Connection.

written by Wilfredo Dominguez

How Fidel Castro and Donald Trump came to be.

The rise of Fidel Castro and Donald Trump was driven by deep societal discontent. Castro exploited the frustrations of the Cuban people with an abusive dictatorship, while Trump tapped into the grievances of Americans disillusioned with establishment politics, plagued by irrational racial resentment, and feeling socially oppressed.

Building on this discontent, both leaders understood the power of personality cults in solidifying their rule. Castro projected himself as a charismatic revolutionary figure, while Trump has cultivated an image of a strongman outsider challenging the political elite. As individuals plagued by biases, Castro recognized, and Trump recognizes today, the importance of such a cult in maintaining their influence.

Cultivating a Cult of Personality.

Since 1959 until the day he died, Castro used rhetoric that demonized his opponents and justified harsh measures against them. His speeches painted a picture of an imperialist threat designed to sink the Cuban revolution, manipulating the Cuban people into supporting his repressive actions.

Likewise, Trump frequently invokes the notion of a deep state conspiracy, using this narrative to deceive his followers and trick them into supporting his actions against made-up enemies, an evil tactic genially employed by Castro.

Of course, such a leadership style relies on the disdain for democratic norms and demands unconditional loyalty, characteristics that highlight the similarities in their approaches to maintaining power.

Political Repression and Economic Disaster

Castro's regime became notorious for its political repression, which extended beyond physical intimidation to insidious psychological control. The most damaging form of repression in Cuba was, and still is today, subliminal, as citizens are conditioned to watch over each other and behave like informants, creating an atmosphere of pervasive fear and mistrust. Similarly, Trump's disregard for established norms of conduct and his constant calls to demonize those who disagree with him foretell a future reminiscent of Castro's tactics.

As a rule of thumb, people pay the price, and under Castro and Trump it has not been much different.

Castro and Trump both favored the empowerment of a specific class, albeit in different contexts. Castro initially empowered his inner circle and loyalists, all members of the Communist Party, ensuring their privileged status while the common people bore the brunt of an economy that has been in decline since 1959. His policies created a stark division between the ruling elite and the general populace, perpetuating economic hardships for most Cubans. Similarly, Trump has consistently favored policies that benefit his billionaire peers, implementing tax cuts and regulations that disproportionately favor the wealthy. This approach has and will continue to cause significant damage to the broader population, exacerbating socio-economic disparities and undermining the well-being of average citizens.

Conclusion.

While the parallels between Fidel Castro and Donald Trump may seem uncanny, they serve as a sobering reminder of the dangers of unchecked power and the fragility of democracy. By recognizing these parallels, we can strive to safeguard against authoritarian tendencies and uphold the principles of freedom and democracy for future generations.